Happy Birthday My Brother, Baron! I can't believe that you are now a pensioner. I still think we are at home, with mom and dad, playing hide and seek with the Lennoks, after 9pm…gosh, that was so much fun! In honor of my brother's birthday, I asked him which film or actor should have won the Oscar and he, immediately, mentioned Apocalypse Now and I agree with him 150%. So who actually won and which film didn't even get nominated is mentioned below..
1. APOCALYPSE NOW
I can't understand how this film did not win because this is not just a movie, it is a film worthy of being called Art. Like “Citizen Kane,” “It's A Wonderful Life,” “Rear Window,” and “Schindler's List,” this film is one we all know whether we have seen it or not. In fact, it is so famous, not only for the actual film, but for all the behind the scenes mayhem. France's Ford Coppola sank all his money into the making of this film which almost bankrupted him. The star of the film, Martin Sheen suffered a heart attack and then there is the tornado called Marlon Brando…”The Horror…The Horror”. There is a documentary about the making of this film which is just as riveting as the film. We follow Martin Sheen who must, during the Vietnam War, locate and exterminate Kurtz, played by Marlon Brando, a colonel gone rogue. We follow Sheen, with a handful of young soldiers, travel into the heart of darkness (an actual book, that I need to reread since I didn't understand it when I initially read it back in high school) finding out more about the brutality of life and its meaning, if there is any. Robert Duvall should have won Best Supporting actor for his portrayal of a crazy, surf loving, Lieutenant Colonel Kilgore who, “loves the smell of napalm in the morning.” This is a must-see film for its acting, plot, music, scenery and the artistic look of the film. What are your thoughts on this film, Baron?
2. KRAMER VS KRAMER
This is the film that won Best Picture as well as Best Actor and Best Supporting Actress, Director plus Beat Adapted Screenplay and.. while it is a good film, I just don’t understand all the hoopla. It is one of the first films to depict a man dealing with raising his child on his own after his wife leaves to “find herself.” He is trying to balance his work while dealing with his son who misses his mom by acting like a real brat ( the ice cream scene is great). I just watched this film again, not having seen it since I saw it in the theatre back in 1979. I still maintain that this is a good film with Hoffman giving a great performance as the out of touch husband who must be the dad to his son(Justin Henry who was nominated in the Beat Supporting Actor category) when his crying wife, played by Meryl Streep, needs to find herself and leaves them. When she returns, she wants her son and takes her husband to court while crying most of the time. Yeah, she won the Best Supporting Actress and I just never understood why she won. For me, she is over-rated and I know I am in the minority in this. Regardless, this is a film worth seeing and it does rug at the heart strings.
3. THE CHINA SYNDROME
This film is a very scary film because it is quite realistic. Why? It deals with the possibility of nuclear meltdown which was met with harsh criticism by the execs at the nuclear power stations. Unfortunately, 12 days after the release of the film, there was a nuclear meltdown at Three Mile Island causing radiation to seep out and the surrounding area to leave their homes and not return. This film is about such an accident possibly occurring but it is a film of fiction, so-called. It stars Jack Lemmon as a high level executive who sees how shoddy work is creating a nuclear meltdown, but no one is listening to him. At the same time, a reporter and cameraman, played by Jane Fonda and Michael Douglas, are doing a story on the nuclear power plant when Lemmon, suspecting a nuclear meltdown, takes over the plant in order to bring awareness to the public about the safety concerns of this plant. The higher-ups and money men want Lemmon shut down and will do anything to get this done. It is an intense, well-acted film that is eerily relevant even today and this was not even nominated for Best Picture.
The other films that were nominated were “Breaking Away”, “All That Jazz”, and “Norma Rae”.
Films not even nominated were “Alien”, “Manhattan” and “And Justice For All”.
Do you agree with this or do you feel another picture should have won or do you agree with the Academy?
That must have been a bumper year for films! Even I have seen most of them.
ReplyDeleteYes, it was a great year for films
DeleteI've seen all of these and agree that Apocalypse Now should have won! It left an impression on me for days after watching it. Heavy stuff! P.S. And Justice For All is one of my favourite movies! ☺ We have the DVD, and now I want to watch it again. "This whole courtroom is out of order!" Al Pacino was awesome in this!
ReplyDeleteI too, need to see And Justice for All again. paxino’s acting blew me away!
DeleteI had no idea there were so many big name stars in Apocalypse now. I need to see it.
ReplyDeleteHappy BDay, Barron:)
Hope you are pain free, Birgit:)
Yes, quite a few in this film which I need to rewatch
DeleteI've only seen Kramer vs Kramer, but it was when it came out. I was something like 8, so my memory is fuzzy. They other two I completely missed.
ReplyDeleteApocalypse Now is a true art film even though it’s a tough one to see. You can’t take your eyes off of it.
DeleteApocalypse Now until a few months ago was probably the biggest hole in my cinematic viewing history. I had been kept at bay by my sister's walking out of it when she went to see it in the theatre and describing how the intensity of it was just more than she could handle so that more or less knocked any eagerness I had to see it out. However, it is a really big blind spot to have for a film lover so I finally bite the bullet when I ran across the film just getting ready to start earlier this year. I cannot say I loved it, respected the artistry of the filmmaking would be closer to the mark. Beautifully acted, very moving and deeply disturbing I was happy to cross it off my list but I'll never watch it again. Of the nominees it really should have won.
ReplyDeleteKramer vs. Kramer is a very fine film of the type that just isn't made anymore for the general public which is a damn shame. Dusty deserved his win, but I agree about Meryl though I think her performance is strong. I just don't think it was Oscar worthy, especially when Jane Alexander gave just as strong a performance in the same film. Actually I'm surprised they didn't cancel each other out enabling rightful winner Candice Bergen to take the award for "Starting Over".
Can't believe "The China Syndrome" wasn't nominated!! It would get my vote and it was showered in other nominations so it is odd that it didn't make the Picture lineup. To this day it remains a powerful viewing experience.
I haven’t seen Apocalypse Now since it came out and would like to see it again. I remember it being off the wall but loving it even if it is one I could not rewatch on a regular basis.
DeleteI sooooo agree bout Meryl Streep. In fact, I was not impressed by her acting there at all and thought she was drippy. I was much more impressed by Jane Alexander.
I would have given the award to Al Pacino who owns his role as the lawyer trying to do the right thing. Again, I have not seen it since it came out, but I want to see this badly.
Apocalypse Now is one of my top favorite films so I'm very biased that it deserved the win.
ReplyDeleteLee
I have never seen Apocalypse Now- but based on your post and the comments I have added it to my list. I hope to watch it this summer. The only one of these movies I have seen is Kramer Vs. Kramer. Thanks for sharing this list!
ReplyDeleteI'm a huge Meryl Streep, fan and understand why Kramer VS Kramer was well received, but I'm kinda lukewarm on this film.
ReplyDeleteHope today is a pain free one:)
Thanks for the birthday shout out, Birgit! What do I think of Apocalypse Now? Where do I begin? It may still be the most profound and visually captivating film I've ever seen. And the focus is on the surrealism and absurdity of war, especially colonial-based conflict. Add to that the timing of its release coinciding with my personal awakening to global affairs and I was bowled over. I know it's a controversial and graphic film but it's also absolutely riveting.
ReplyDeleteI've never seen all of Apocalypse Now....I really need to fix that some day.
ReplyDelete